TY - JOUR
T1 - ABRACADABRA Aids Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Early Literacy in Australia: Evidence from a Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial
AU - Wolgemuth, Jennifer R.
AU - Savage, Robert
AU - Helmer, Janet
AU - Harper, Helen
AU - Lea, Tess
AU - Abrami, Phillip C.
AU - Kirby, Adrienne
AU - Chalkiti, Kalotina
AU - Morris, Peter
AU - Carapetis, Jonathan
AU - Louden, William
PY - 2013/9/1
Y1 - 2013/9/1
N2 - In many western countries, identifiable populations of children read below age-expectations, and the need for effective interventions remains pressing. Indigenous populations across the globe tend to have reading outcomes lower than comparative general populations. This is a critical issue in Australia's Northern Territory where Indigenous students are far less likely to meet minimum reading standards. There is some evidence to suggest that computer-based instruction may be of particular benefit to struggling readers. To redress reading disparities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous students, a multisite single-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of the ABRACADABRA web-based reading tool, http://abralite.concordia.ca , on reading, letter knowledge, and phonological awareness was conducted in Northern Territory, Australian primary schools with 164 intervention and 148 control (regular instruction) children. The total sample was 28% Indigenous. Results revealed that all intervention group students made significant gains in phonological awareness ( d = .37) and phoneme-grapheme knowledge over control group peers ( d = .37). Indigenous students gained significantly more per hour of instruction than non-Indigenous students in phonological awareness and early literacy skills. Results suggest that ABRACADABRA prevents lags in foundational literacy experienced by poor readers including Indigenous students.
AB - In many western countries, identifiable populations of children read below age-expectations, and the need for effective interventions remains pressing. Indigenous populations across the globe tend to have reading outcomes lower than comparative general populations. This is a critical issue in Australia's Northern Territory where Indigenous students are far less likely to meet minimum reading standards. There is some evidence to suggest that computer-based instruction may be of particular benefit to struggling readers. To redress reading disparities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous students, a multisite single-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of the ABRACADABRA web-based reading tool, http://abralite.concordia.ca , on reading, letter knowledge, and phonological awareness was conducted in Northern Territory, Australian primary schools with 164 intervention and 148 control (regular instruction) children. The total sample was 28% Indigenous. Results revealed that all intervention group students made significant gains in phonological awareness ( d = .37) and phoneme-grapheme knowledge over control group peers ( d = .37). Indigenous students gained significantly more per hour of instruction than non-Indigenous students in phonological awareness and early literacy skills. Results suggest that ABRACADABRA prevents lags in foundational literacy experienced by poor readers including Indigenous students.
KW - computer-based instruction
KW - early literacy
KW - phonological awareness
KW - indigenous populations
KW - randomized experiment
UR - https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/esf_facpub/176
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.002
U2 - 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.002
DO - 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.002
M3 - Article
VL - 67
JO - Computers & Education
JF - Computers & Education
ER -