Carbonate Complexation of Yttrium and the Rare Earth Elements in Natural Waters

Yu-Ran Luo, Robert H. Byrne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

<p> Potentiometric measurements of Yttrium and Rare Earth Element (YREE) complexation by carbonate and bicarbonate indicate that the quality of carbonate complexation constants previously obtained via solvent exchange analyses are superior to characterizations obtained using solubility and adsorptive exchange analyses. The results of our analyses at 25&deg;C are combined with the results of previous solvent exchange analyses to obtain YREE carbonate complexation constants over a wide range of ionic strength (0 &le; I &le;3 molal). YREE carbonate complexation constants are reported for the following equilibria, M <sup> 3+ </sup> +nHCO <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> &minus; </sup> &rlhar;M(CO <sub> 3 </sub> ) <sub> n </sub> <sup> 3&minus;2n </sup> +nH <sup> + </sup> , where n = 1 or 2. Formation constants written in terms of HCO <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> &minus; </sup> concentrations require only minor corrections for ion pairing relative to the corrections required for constants expressed in terms of CO <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> 2&minus; </sup> concentrations. Formation constants for the above complexation equilibria, <sub> CO </sub> <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> H </sup> &beta; <sub> 1 </sub> =[MCO <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> + </sup> ][H <sup> + </sup> ][M <sup> 3+ </sup> ] <sup> &minus;1 </sup> [HCO <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> &minus; </sup> ] <sup> &minus;1 </sup> and <sub> CO </sub> <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> H </sup> &beta; <sub> 2 </sub> =[M(CO <sub> 3 </sub> ) <sub> 2 </sub> <sup> &minus; </sup> ][H <sup> + </sup> ] <sup> 2 </sup> [M <sup> 3+ </sup> ] <sup> &minus;1 </sup> [HCO <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> &minus; </sup> ] <sup> &minus;2 </sup> , have very similar dependencies on ionic strength because the reaction MCO <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> + </sup> +HCO <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> &minus; </sup> &rlhar;M(CO <sub> 3 </sub> ) <sub> 2 </sub> <sup> &minus; </sup> +H <sup> + </sup> is isocoulombic. Potentiometric analyses indicate that the dependence of log <sub> CO </sub> <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> H </sup> &beta; <sub> 1 </sub> and log <sub> CO </sub> <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> H </sup> &beta; <sub> 2 </sub> on ionic strength at 25&deg;C is given as (A)logCO3H&beta;n=logCO3H&beta;n0&minus;4.088I0.5/(1+3.033I0.5)+0.042I"&gt;logCO3H&beta;n=logCO3H&beta;n0&minus;4.088I0.5/(1+3.033I0.5)+0.042I where <sub> CO </sub> <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> H </sup> &beta; <sub> n </sub> <sup> 0 </sup> denotes a formation constant at 25&deg;C and zero ionic strength. Recommended values for log <sub> CO3 </sub> <sup> H </sup> &beta; <sub> 1 </sub> and log <sub> CO </sub> <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> H </sup> &beta; <sub> 2 </sub> <sup> 0 </sup> , expressed in the form (element, &minus;log <sub> CO </sub> <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> H </sup> &beta; <sub> 1 </sub> <sup> 0 </sup> , &minus;log <sub> CO </sub> <sub> 3 </sub> <sup> H </sup> &beta; <sub> 2 </sub> <sup> 0 </sup> ), are as follows: (Y, 2.85, 8.03), (La, 3.60, 9.36), (Ce, 3.27, 8.90), (Pr, 3.10, 8.58), (Nd, 3.05, 8.49), (Sm, 2.87, 8.13), (Eu, 2.85, 8.03), (Gd, 2.94, 8.18), (Tb, 2.87, 7.88), (Dy, 2.77, 7.75), (Ho, 2.78, 7.66), (Er, 2.72, 7.54), (Tm, 2.65, 7.39), (Yb, 2.53, 7.36), (Lu, 2.58, 7.29).</p>
Original languageAmerican English
JournalGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Volume68
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2004

Disciplines

  • Life Sciences

Cite this