TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Axisymmetric and Planar Fracture Mechanics Models for Fiber-Reinforced Composites
AU - Kaw, Autar
AU - Ye, Jiafei
PY - 1994/3/1
Y1 - 1994/3/1
N2 - Many fracture mechanics models based on either 3D-axisymmetric or 2D-planar models are used to predict mechanical parameters of composites, such as their fracture toughness, matrix crack initiation stress and stiffness. In this study, fracture mechanics models for a composite geometry with a matrix crack under uniform crack pressure are developed using both 3D-axisymmetric and 2D-planar assumptions. Three critical parameters, namely the stress intensity factor at the crack tips, the maximum crack-opening displacements and the stress ratios at the interface, which are used to quantify the above mechanical parameters of a composite, are compared for the two models. The results for the stress ratios at the interface, which are used to predict the path of crack propagation near a fiber-matrix interface, are close to each other. However, the results for the stress intensity factor and the crack-opening displacements, which are used to quantify matrix crack initiation stress and damaged composite longitudinal stiffness, differ considerably.
AB - Many fracture mechanics models based on either 3D-axisymmetric or 2D-planar models are used to predict mechanical parameters of composites, such as their fracture toughness, matrix crack initiation stress and stiffness. In this study, fracture mechanics models for a composite geometry with a matrix crack under uniform crack pressure are developed using both 3D-axisymmetric and 2D-planar assumptions. Three critical parameters, namely the stress intensity factor at the crack tips, the maximum crack-opening displacements and the stress ratios at the interface, which are used to quantify the above mechanical parameters of a composite, are compared for the two models. The results for the stress ratios at the interface, which are used to predict the path of crack propagation near a fiber-matrix interface, are close to each other. However, the results for the stress intensity factor and the crack-opening displacements, which are used to quantify matrix crack initiation stress and damaged composite longitudinal stiffness, differ considerably.
UR - https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/egr_facpub/186
UR - https://doi.org/10.1016/0961-9526(94)90105-8
U2 - 10.1016/0961-9526(94)90105-8
DO - 10.1016/0961-9526(94)90105-8
M3 - Article
VL - 4
JO - Composites Engineering
JF - Composites Engineering
ER -