TY - JOUR
T1 - Cultural Validity of the Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation Level K Phonological Awareness Scale for Indigenous Australians
AU - Wolgemuth, Jennifer R.
AU - Harper, Helen
AU - Hernandez, Paul R.
AU - Helmer, Janet
PY - 2013/1/1
Y1 - 2013/1/1
N2 - In this study, we investigate the cultural validity of the group reading assessment and diagnostic evaluation, level K (grade K) phonological awareness scale for Australian indigenous students. Results revealed measurement variance between indigenous (n = 224) and non-indigenous students (n = 286). Nine out of the 30 phonological awareness items exhibited uniform differential item function (DIF), indicating these items were more difficult for the indigenous students, controlling for ability. Additionally, results revealed three out of the 30 items exhibited non-uniform DIF indicating that the items exhibited a different relationship to phonological awareness in the indigenous and non-indigenous groups. A distractor analysis compared differences in distractor item choice to explain indigenous students’ difficulty with the items. Through a linguistic and cultural lens, our analysis does not provide sufficient evidence to determine why particular items were more difficult than others for indigenous students. The phonologies of indigenous students’ home languages did not appear to explain the different performance of indigenous and non-indigenous students.
AB - In this study, we investigate the cultural validity of the group reading assessment and diagnostic evaluation, level K (grade K) phonological awareness scale for Australian indigenous students. Results revealed measurement variance between indigenous (n = 224) and non-indigenous students (n = 286). Nine out of the 30 phonological awareness items exhibited uniform differential item function (DIF), indicating these items were more difficult for the indigenous students, controlling for ability. Additionally, results revealed three out of the 30 items exhibited non-uniform DIF indicating that the items exhibited a different relationship to phonological awareness in the indigenous and non-indigenous groups. A distractor analysis compared differences in distractor item choice to explain indigenous students’ difficulty with the items. Through a linguistic and cultural lens, our analysis does not provide sufficient evidence to determine why particular items were more difficult than others for indigenous students. The phonologies of indigenous students’ home languages did not appear to explain the different performance of indigenous and non-indigenous students.
KW - phonological awareness assessment
KW - indigenous Australian
KW - cultural validity
KW - measurement invariance
KW - differential item function
KW - distractor analysis
UR - https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/esf_facpub/177
UR - https://doi.org/10.1504/IJQRE.2013.057697
U2 - 10.1504/IJQRE.2013.057697
DO - 10.1504/IJQRE.2013.057697
M3 - Article
VL - 1
JO - International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education
JF - International Journal of Quantitative Research in Education
ER -