TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the beliefs surrounding student evaluations of instruction in criminology and criminal justice undergraduate courses
AU - Michelle Lersch, Kim
AU - Greek, Cecil
PY - 2001/1/1
Y1 - 2001/1/1
N2 - Student evaluations of instructors are given consideration in a number of important decisions concerning instructors such as hiring, merit pay, and in the tenure and promotion process. However, a number of popular beliefs surround the interpretation of these evaluations. Using student evaluations for the three research-oriented universities in the state of Florida as a database, a number of these beliefs are explored. Specifically, the effects of instructor attributes (such as gender, rank and grades) and course characteristics (such as class size, type, number of course meetings, and time of day offered) on the end of the semester student evaluation rankings are discussed.
AB - Student evaluations of instructors are given consideration in a number of important decisions concerning instructors such as hiring, merit pay, and in the tenure and promotion process. However, a number of popular beliefs surround the interpretation of these evaluations. Using student evaluations for the three research-oriented universities in the state of Florida as a database, a number of these beliefs are explored. Specifically, the effects of instructor attributes (such as gender, rank and grades) and course characteristics (such as class size, type, number of course meetings, and time of day offered) on the end of the semester student evaluation rankings are discussed.
UR - https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/si_facpub/594
UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/10511250100086121
U2 - 10.1080/10511250100086121
DO - 10.1080/10511250100086121
M3 - Article
VL - 12
JO - Journal of Criminal Justice Education
JF - Journal of Criminal Justice Education
ER -