Hydrogeomorphic (HGM) Assessment - A Test of User Consistency

Dennis F. Whigham, Lyndon C. Lee, Mark M. Brinson, Richard D. Rheomhardt, Mark C. Rains, Jeffrey A. Mason, Humaira Kahn, Melanie B. Ruhlman, Wade B. Nutter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We describe the first test conducted to determine user consistency in the application of hydrogeomorphic (HGM) functional assessment models. Over a three-week period, two teams of individuals trained in the HGM methodology assessed 44 riverine wetlands on the Coastal Plain of Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia, USA. Results demonstrated a high degree of agreement between the two assessment teams for both Variable Subindices and Functional Capacity Index Scores, indicating that the assessment models were robust and results were repeatable. Analyses of the data demonstrated the importance of only using variables whose measurements are repeatable. When variable measurements are not repeatable, HGM functional capacity scores are detrimentally affected, especially functions that are modeled by only a few variables.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalWetlands
Volume19
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 1999
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • hydrogeomorphic approach
  • HGM
  • riverine wetlands
  • reference wetlands
  • test of user
  • consistency
  • Maryland
  • Virginia
  • Delaware

Cite this