Re/producing Knowledge in Health and Medicine: Designing Research Methods for Mental Health

Peter Cannon; Katie Lynn Walkup

doi:10.1080/10572252.2021.1930184

Re/producing Knowledge in Health and Medicine: Designing Research Methods for Mental Health

Peter Cannon, Katie Lynn Walkup

School of Information

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Constructing mental health interventions comes with specific methodological challenges, especially when working with vulnerable communities. Developing means of assessment for such projects compounds these challenges because the need to protect participant information may conflict with the need to produce persuasive results about the intervention to obtain funding for additional care. This article seeks to redress these methodological challenges by proposing new protocols for approving and assessing mental health interventions centered within multiply marginalized communities.

Original language	American English
Journal	Technical Communication Quarterly
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2021.1930184
State	Published - Jun 8 2021

Keywords

Health/medical communication
rhetoric of science;
action research
design of communication
methodology

Disciplines

Technical and Professional Writing
Library and Information Science

Access to Document

10.1080/10572252.2021.1930184License: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{af02ce5eec494ffe84fb36707ed3a6ab,

title = "Re/producing Knowledge in Health and Medicine: Designing Research Methods for Mental Health",

abstract = " Constructing mental health interventions comes with specific methodological challenges, especially when working with vulnerable communities. Developing means of assessment for such projects compounds these challenges because the need to protect participant information may conflict with the need to produce persuasive results about the intervention to obtain funding for additional care. This article seeks to redress these methodological challenges by proposing new protocols for approving and assessing mental health interventions centered within multiply marginalized communities. ",

keywords = "Health/medical communication, rhetoric of science;, action research, design of communication, methodology",

author = "Peter Cannon and Walkup, {Katie Lynn}",

note = "ABSTRACT Constructing mental health interventions comes with specific methodological challenges, especially when working with vulnerable communities. Developing means of assessment for such projects compounds these challenges because the need to protect participant information may conflict with the need to produce persuasive results about the intervention to obtain funding for additional care.",

year = "2021",

month = jun,

day = "8",

doi = "10.1080/10572252.2021.1930184",

language = "American English",

journal = "Technical Communication Quarterly",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re/producing Knowledge in Health and Medicine: Designing Research Methods for Mental Health

AU - Cannon, Peter

AU - Walkup, Katie Lynn

N1 - ABSTRACT Constructing mental health interventions comes with specific methodological challenges, especially when working with vulnerable communities. Developing means of assessment for such projects compounds these challenges because the need to protect participant information may conflict with the need to produce persuasive results about the intervention to obtain funding for additional care.

PY - 2021/6/8

Y1 - 2021/6/8

N2 - Constructing mental health interventions comes with specific methodological challenges, especially when working with vulnerable communities. Developing means of assessment for such projects compounds these challenges because the need to protect participant information may conflict with the need to produce persuasive results about the intervention to obtain funding for additional care. This article seeks to redress these methodological challenges by proposing new protocols for approving and assessing mental health interventions centered within multiply marginalized communities.

AB - Constructing mental health interventions comes with specific methodological challenges, especially when working with vulnerable communities. Developing means of assessment for such projects compounds these challenges because the need to protect participant information may conflict with the need to produce persuasive results about the intervention to obtain funding for additional care. This article seeks to redress these methodological challenges by proposing new protocols for approving and assessing mental health interventions centered within multiply marginalized communities.

KW - Health/medical communication

KW - rhetoric of science;

KW - action research

KW - design of communication

KW - methodology

UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10572252.2021.1930184

U2 - 10.1080/10572252.2021.1930184

DO - 10.1080/10572252.2021.1930184

M3 - Article

JO - Technical Communication Quarterly

JF - Technical Communication Quarterly

ER -

Re/producing Knowledge in Health and Medicine: Designing Research Methods for Mental Health

Abstract

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this