The intact systems argument: Problems with the standard defense of animal experimentation.

Hugh LaFollette; Niall Shanks

The intact systems argument: Problems with the standard defense of animal experimentation.

Hugh LaFollette
, Niall Shanks

University of South Florida

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	Default journal
State	Published - Jan 1 1993

Keywords

Ethics
Animal experimentation

Disciplines

History
Philosophy

Access to Document

Cite this

@article{cee626f4c4b24c5bb027d3a51792c645,

title = "The intact systems argument: Problems with the standard defense of animal experimentation.",

keywords = "Ethics, Animal experimentation",

author = "Hugh LaFollette and Niall Shanks",

note = "LaFollette, H. Shanks, N. (1993). The intact systems argument: Problems with the standard defense of animal experimentation. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 31(3), 323-333.",

year = "1993",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

journal = "Default journal",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The intact systems argument: Problems with the standard defense of animal experimentation.

AU - LaFollette, Hugh

AU - Shanks, Niall

N1 - LaFollette, H. Shanks, N. (1993). The intact systems argument: Problems with the standard defense of animal experimentation. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 31(3), 323-333.

PY - 1993/1/1

Y1 - 1993/1/1

KW - Ethics

KW - Animal experimentation

UR - https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/fac_publications/2251

UR - https://login.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/login?url=http://www.pdcnet.org/collection/authorizedshow?id=southernjphil_1993_0031_0003_0323_0333pdfname=southernjphil_1993_0031_0003_0073_0083.pdffile_type=pdf

M3 - Article

JO - Default journal

JF - Default journal

ER -

The intact systems argument: Problems with the standard defense of animal experimentation.

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this