Uncertainty in Maternal Exposures to Ambient PMsub2.5/sub and Benzene during Pregnancy: Sensitivity to Exposure Estimation Decisions

Jean Paul Tanner, Jason Lee Salemi, Amy L. Stuart, Haofei Yu, Melissa M. Jordan, Chris DuClos, Philip Cavicchia, Jane A. Correia, Sharon M. Watkins, Russell S. Kirby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We investigate uncertainty in estimates of pregnant women's exposure to ambient PM 2.5 and benzene derived from central-site monitoring data. Through a study of live births in Florida during 2000–2009, we discuss the selection of spatial and temporal scales of analysis, limiting distances, and aggregation method. We estimate exposure concentrations and classify exposure for a range of alternatives, and compare impacts. Estimated exposure concentrations were most sensitive to the temporal scale of analysis for PM 2.5 , with similar sensitivity to spatial scale for benzene. Using 1–12 versus 3–8 weeks of gestational age as the exposure window resulted in reclassification of exposure by at least one quartile for up to 37% of mothers for PM2.5 and 27% for benzene. The largest mean absolute differences in concentration resulting from any decision were 0.78 µg/m 3 and 0.44 ppbC, respectively. No bias toward systematically higher or lower estimates was found between choices for any decision.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalSpatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
Volume17
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2016

Keywords

  • Air pollution
  • Birth defects
  • Benzene
  • Particles

Cite this